Union for Reconstruction of Romania - URR
Uniunea pentru Reconstrucția României - URR
 This is my Home! This is my Home! 
 Add to my Favorites! Add to my Favorites! 
 Intră pe forum!

Closed: 31.12.2004
  Home     Press releases      Press coverage   

Language
Română  Magyar  English
...in site!
Nicholson's Reports On Romania - 2004
The National
Convention
The URR Policies
Code of Conduct
The URR Doctrine
Q & A
 Our Spirit  

EACH AND EVERYONE MATTERS IF YOU DON'T GET INVOLVED, NOTING WILL CHANGE
Press Rel.
2003  
01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12
2003  
01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12
2002  
07 08 09 10 11 12
Reports
2003  
01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12
2002 finacial report
07 08 09 10 11 12
Search
Google

Date: 10.09.2002

PRESS RELEASE

PSD can transform administrative reorganization into a division
of Romania in influence spheres for party "barons"

URR warns that modifying the administrative structure of Romania could turn into a division of the territory according to economical interests of the central and local PSD lead.

 

Discussing this subject before solving the serious problems related to the complete corruption of some administrative structures managed by PSD heads can create the legalisation of their unlimited and unwanted influence. On the table will be not the 8 development regions, but Oprisan region, Mischie, Tarau, Iacubov and, unfortunately, others also.

 

Before involving all regions in discussing the issue of regionalisation, which is mandatory for EU integration, the State Secretary Mihai David already made public that the number of regions will be 8, just as that of economical regions, but also the fact that further changes can come up related to the districts making up the regions. Dividing the territory in the 8 economical development regions hasn't yet proven its efficiency, in spite of the programs under discussion with EU representatives.

 

We understand the resistance to change of Nastase government ministers, but we want to draw your attention to the fact that neither the number or the structure of current regions isn’t by far the best solution.
If we will discuss in a realistic manner about development opportunities and not only about messing EU money, then there are too few elements connecting Bihor to Bistrita-Nasaud (region 6), Vaslui and Suceava (region 1), Arges and Ialomita (region 3), let alone Buzau and Constanta (region 2).

The debate issued to all civil society has to refer to all elements that will define this decision, respecting crieria no longer related to financial and political interests of the temporarry leading party.

 

 

Cosmin Alexandru
President, Union for the Reconstruction of Romania - URR



Do you have an ideea, sugestion, or request
regarding this site? Send it to webmaster@urr.ro

 hits 
  URR